JudicialJudge Dismisses Texas Heartbeat Act Lawsuit for Lack of Legal Standing, No ‘Direct Impact’

The judge ruled that the lawsuit against an abortion provider could not continue because the plaintiff was not directly impacted by the abortion in question.
December 9, 2022
A state court on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit filed against a doctor who performed an abortion after the Texas Heartbeat Act went into effect.

The Heartbeat Act, also known as Senate Bill (SB) 8, made abortion illegal after a fetal pulse is detected, around the sixth week of pregnancy.

What set the law apart was its enforcement mechanism. Rather than empowering government agencies, it authorized private citizens to file civil suits against abortion providers or those who helped facilitate it in some manner — excluding fathers who conceived said children out of rape or incest — for up to $10,000.

After SB 8 took effect on September 1, 2021, OB/GYN Dr. Alan Braid penned an op-ed for the Washington Post claiming he performed an abortion on September 6 in violation of the law. “I fully understood that there could be legal consequences,” Braid wrote, “but I wanted to make sure that Texas didn’t get away with its bid to prevent this blatantly unconstitutional law from being tested.”

He was then slapped with multiple lawsuits, some to enforce the law and some to force a court review of SB 8 and see if it could be overturned.

The Texan Tumbler

A December 8 press release from the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), which is defending Braid in one of his suits, revealed that the judge had thrown the case out. “This is the first and only case filed against a provider under S.B. 8 to be resolved by a court,” the release reads.

According to CRR, the court said that citizens do not have the right to file suit against those who perform or abet abortions “if they have not been directly impacted by the abortion services provided.”

This does not invalidate SB as a whole. This also has no effect on the Human Life Protection Act, also known as the “trigger ban,” which went into effect on August 25 this year. This law made it illegal to perform or abet abortions unless to save the mother from death or substantial bodily impairment.

Unlike SB 8, the trigger ban does allow the government to prosecute and punish for abortion: five to 99 years in prison and up to $10,000 in fines.

The Texan reached out to the office of state Sen. Bryan Hughes (R-Mineola), who first introduced the Heartbeat Act, for comment, but received no response by the time of publication.


Disclosure: Unlike almost every other media outlet, The Texan is not beholden to any special interests, does not apply for any type of state or federal funding, and relies exclusively on its readers for financial support. If you’d like to become one of the people we’re financially accountable to, click here to subscribe.

Get “KB's Hot Take”

A free bi-weekly commentary on current events by Konni Burton.

Rob Laucius

Rob Laucius is the Assistant Editor of The Texan. He graduated summa cum laude from Hillsdale College in 2022 with his Bachelor’s in History, and has interned for the U.S. House of Representatives and Veterans Administration. In his free time, he continues to read and write.