Local NewsLindale City Council Rejects Ordinance to Ban Abortion in Favor of Non-Binding Resolution

Many pro-life residents in Lindale were disappointed after their city council rejected their request for an ordinance to outlaw abortion, passing a non-binding resolution instead.
February 19, 2020
On Tuesday night, pro-life residents and advocates flocked to the city council meeting in Lindale, an East Texas town of around 5,000 residents just 14 miles northwest of Tyler.

For the fourth time, they were urging city officials to adopt an ordinance that would effectively outlaw abortion within city limits.

Instead of passing an ordinance, the council heeded the recommendation of the city attorney to adopt a non-binding resolution condemning abortion.

Such an ordinance was first adopted by the small town of Waskom last June, and several other cities have followed in their footsteps to declare themselves a “sanctuary city for the unborn.”

Currently, twelve cities have adopted the ordinance: Waskom, Naples, Joaquin, Tenaha, Gilmer, Westbrook, Rusk, Colorado City, Gary, Big Spring, and Wells.

The Texan Tumbler

According to the Tyler Morning Telegraph, Glen Patrick, the city’s attorney, argued before the council that the proposed ordinance would be unconstitutional because of its enforcement mechanisms.

Patrick was unavailable to comment on his opposition to the ordinance.

Mark Lee Dickson, the director of Right to Life of East Texas who has been leading the charge urging more cities to adopt the pro-life ordinance, said that Patrick did “not understand the ordinance” and that “it’s a great disservice to the residents of Lindale that Senator Bryan Hughes was not reached out to or any attorney that was involved in the writing of the ordinance.”

The sanctuary city for the unborn ordinances, such as the version that recently passed in Wells, contain two enforcement provisions.

First, with a public enforcement mechanism, while an abortion facility will not be penalized immediately for operating within city limits, fines for performing each abortion will accrue over time and then be charged in full after Roe v. Wade is overruled.

A second, private enforcement mechanism allows individuals related to the unborn child who is aborted to sue those who committed or assisted in committing the abortion.

The resolution that was passed by the Lindale city council on Tuesday has no binding force, but simply condemns abortion.

“Not a single resident of the City of Lindale clapped after the city council passed the resolution of words instead of an ordinance of action,” wrote Dickson in Facebook post.

A similar resolution was passed last year in the East Texas town of Omaha, after the city council walked back the passage of an ordinance.

No abortion clinics are located in the towns that have passed the ordinances, nor have any lawsuits been filed against them because of the ordinances.

The movement has gained the attention of pro-choice activists, though, who have described it as a “growing epidemic.”


Disclosure: Unlike almost every other media outlet, The Texan is not beholden to any special interests, does not apply for any type of state or federal funding, and relies exclusively on its readers for financial support. If you’d like to become one of the people we’re financially accountable to, click here to subscribe.

Get “KB's Hot Take”

A free bi-weekly commentary on current events by Konni Burton.

Daniel Friend

Daniel Friend is the Marketing and Media Manager for The Texan. After graduating with a double-major in Political Science and Humanities, he wrote for The Texan as a reporter through June 2022. In his spare time, you're likely to find him working on The Testimony of Calvin Lewis, an Abolition of Man-inspired novel and theatrical podcast.

Related Posts