Parents of Drake Pardo Petition to Have Name Removed from Child Abuse Registry

After a court dismissed the CPS case against Drake Pardo's parents, the Pardo family is now petitioning to have their name removed from the Child Abuse Registry.
July 28, 2020
Child Protective Services (CPS) ignited a controversy in June of last year when they removed four-year-old Drake Pardo from his family’s home while refusing to disclose what child abuse allegations had been made against his parents, Ashley and Daniel Pardo.

While Drake was ultimately reunited with his parents and the case was dismissed by a family court in December, the Pardos’ names are still included in the Child Abuse and Neglect Central Registry.

Inclusion in this registry will show up in background checks and can prevent an individual from employment or volunteering.

According to the Department of Family and Protective Services’ (DFPS) policy handbook, “an individual is included in the central registry when the investigation resulted in a disposition of ‘reason to believe’ in a CPS or CCL investigation.”

Although the DFPS handbook notes that individuals who were “not found to have caused child abuse or neglect are not included in the central registry,” those determined otherwise by the agency at some point in the investigation — even if the case is dismissed by the courts — are kept on the registry.

The Texan Tumbler

During the Texas legislative session in 2017, the Texas Home School Coalition (THSC) — which assisted the Pardos in their legal fight with CPS last year — supported a bill authored by Rep. Stephanie Klick (R-Fort Worth) to reform the registry by providing ways to remove names.

While Klick’s bill died in committee, another bill authored by former Rep. Cindy Burkett (R-Sunnyvale) and Rep. Greg Bonnen (R-Friendswood) was passed by the legislature in 2017 and amended the state family code to provide three ways for a name to be removed from the registry:

  • “an administrative review or an appeal of the review conducted under Section 261.309(c);”
  • “a review or an appeal of the review conducted by the office of consumer affairs of the department; or”
  • “a hearing or an appeal conducted by the State Office of Administrative Hearings.”

THSC stated on Tuesday that the family’s attorneys are currently pursuing the second option by appealing to the office of consumer affairs.

“CPS protects thousands of children every year who desperately need their assistance, but this type of abuse of innocent families causes the agency to become the source of harm to a child instead of that child’s protector,” stated THSC.

A spokesperson for DFPS declined to comment on the Pardo case saying that “specific reviews are confidential,” but provided a link to more information about the process of an administrative review in the department.


Disclosure: Unlike almost every other media outlet, The Texan is not beholden to any special interests, does not apply for any type of state or federal funding, and relies exclusively on its readers for financial support. If you’d like to become one of the people we’re financially accountable to, click here to subscribe.

Get “KB's Hot Take”

A free bi-weekly commentary on current events by Konni Burton.

Daniel Friend

Daniel Friend is the Marketing and Media Manager for The Texan. After graduating with a double-major in Political Science and Humanities, he wrote for The Texan as a reporter through June 2022. In his spare time, you're likely to find him working on The Testimony of Calvin Lewis, an Abolition of Man-inspired novel and theatrical podcast.

Related Posts