87th LegislatureState Senate‘Read the Damn Bill:’ Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Pushes Back Against Criticisms of Election Integrity Legislation

Dan Patrick responded to criticisms of the Senate’s election integrity bill, saying the legislation does nothing to suppress voters but will help secure elections.
April 6, 2021
Much hullabaloo has been made over the Texas Senate’s latest efforts to shore up election security in the form of Senate Bill (SB) 7.

The legislation, with Sen. Bryan Hughes (R-Mineola) as the chief author, was voted out of the upper chamber early last Thursday morning along party lines and was sent to the state House.

SB 7 has been the focal point of criticism from Democrats, who have denounced the legislation as “voter suppression” comparable to the Jim Crow-era laws that enforced racial segregation and literacy requirements and other criteria to vote.

“The bottom line is we must stop this race-baiting on every issue,” said Lt. Governor Dan Patrick during a spirited press conference Tuesday morning.

Patrick repeatedly emphasized that the legislation passed by the Senate has nothing to do with voter suppression, contrary to the claims of American Airlines which released a statement in opposition to the bill on Thursday.

The Texan Tumbler

Rather, Patrick argued, Senate Republicans are pushing for SB 7 to become law because “voters want confidence in their election system.”

The lieutenant governor paid special attention to Texas-based American Airlines throughout the press conference, noting as he previously did that a representative of the company called his office before releasing the statement of opposition.

Patrick said that the company reached out to tell him that their position on the bill “was not personal.”

But Patrick said that he did take American Airlines’ position personally, saying that the company effectively called him and the Republicans who voted for the legislation racists.

He also reiterated that the representative from the company told Patrick that neither he nor CEO Doug Parker had read the bill before issuing their statement against it.

“You have a right to your opinion, but read the damn bill,” said Patrick.

Asked if any officials in the company had read the bill before issuing the statement, and if so, what specific aspects of the bill they oppose, American Airlines spokesperson Stacy Day told The Texan, “Our team reviewed the bill.”

The company has not provided any more specific criticisms apart from the broad statement criticizing the bill as having “provisions that limit voting access.”

Patrick said that companies that “keep meddling in issues” unrelated to legislation that directly affects their businesses are “turning off 50 percent or more of [their] potential customers.”

American Airlines did not respond to a question about the potential of the company driving away customers by taking a highly partisan position.

Continuing to chide the company, Patrick continued to rhetorically ask “Mr. American Airlines” if certain policies of SB 7 are acceptable, including requiring physical backups for every vote, extending privacy protections for curbside voting, and live-streaming vote counting in the state’s largest counties.

But though Patrick was sharply critical of the companies taking such political stances, he said he did not advocate cutting grants or removing their tax breaks.

“This isn’t quid-pro-quo,” said Patrick. “We don’t punish businesses for disagreeing with us.”

The lieutenant governor noted that “nothing has changed” with respect to early voting in the bill, pointing out that under the legislation, Texas would still have longer early voting periods than states like New York.

Patrick also referred to the similar criticism surrounding legislation in 2011 to require photo identification to vote, and pointed out that both voter registration and voter turnout have expanded significantly in the last decade despite claims that the requirement was “voter suppression.”

He also criticized the Houston area Democratic officials who held a press conference regarding the election legislation on Monday, saying that they failed to demonstrate how the legislation would suppress voters.

Several aspects of SB 7 are seen as a response to election policies implemented by Harris County in November’s election, such as a codified prohibition on 24-hour voting, drive-through voting, and mass solicitation of mail ballots.

“I have news for Harris County,” said Patrick. “You’re not the capital of Texas.”


Disclosure: Unlike almost every other media outlet, The Texan is not beholden to any special interests, does not apply for any type of state or federal funding, and relies exclusively on its readers for financial support. If you’d like to become one of the people we’re financially accountable to, click here to subscribe.

Get “KB's Hot Take”

A free bi-weekly commentary on current events by Konni Burton.

Daniel Friend

Daniel Friend is the Marketing and Media Manager for The Texan. After graduating with a double-major in Political Science and Humanities, he wrote for The Texan as a reporter through June 2022. In his spare time, you're likely to find him working on The Testimony of Calvin Lewis, an Abolition of Man-inspired novel and theatrical podcast.