In the letter, the lawmakers say that they fear the “Biden Administration is intent on creating a federal gun registry by circumventing the legislative process.”
Under current law and regulations, federal firearms licensees (FFLs) that are in the gun-selling business are required to keep records of firearm purchases for at least 20 years.
Although law prohibits the federal government from maintaining a centralized registry of firearm ownership, FFLs that go out of business are required to transfer their records to the ATF.
A new rule for the department that is being considered by the Biden administration would, among other things, require FFLs to maintain records of firearm purchases indefinitely instead of 20 years.
“Texans are rightfully wary of efforts from an intrusive federal government to consolidate control at the expense of our liberties,” said Cloud in a statement to The Texan.
“Americans have the constitutional right to keep and bear arms — to protect themselves and their families. The proposed rule by the Biden Administration would put our country on the path to a federal gun registry, which infringes those second amendment rights. As a member of Congress, it is my job to hold them accountable.”
Cloud and his colleagues included a list of questions for the ATF in their letter about the out-of-business records that the agency retains, including the total number of records and how often they have been used to successfully prosecute violent criminals in the past three years.
Fellow Texans who signed onto Cloud’s letter include Reps. Pete Sessions (R-TX-17), Van Taylor (R-TX-03), Ronny Jackson (R-TX-13), Chip Roy (R-TX-21), Lance Gooden (R-TX-05), Roger Williams (R-TX-25), and Louie Gohmert (R-TX-01).
In addition to the letter, 27 members of Congress — including Cloud, a few of the members listed above, and Rep. Randy Weber (R-TX-14) — also submitted a comment in opposition to the proposed rule change.
The comment lists in detail their complaints with the proposed rule, which they describe as “omnibus gun control legislation clothed as a regulation to implement the existing statute.”
“[It] should be withdrawn immediately, as it is outside the authority of bureaucrats to enact new criminal laws or to amend statutes passed by Congress in order to regulate items that heretofore have been unregulated,” the lawmakers write.
“The [Department of Justice] is free to make its recommendations to Congress in the normal course of business, but only Congress, as the elected representatives of ‘the people,’ has the authority to change existing statutes or to enact new criminal laws.”
Disclosure: Unlike almost every other media outlet, The Texan is not beholden to any special interests, does not apply for any type of state or federal funding, and relies exclusively on its readers for financial support. If you’d like to become one of the people we’re financially accountable to, click here to subscribe.
Daniel Friend is the Marketing and Media Manager for The Texan. After graduating with a double-major in Political Science and Humanities, he wrote for The Texan as a reporter through June 2022. In his spare time, you're likely to find him working on The Testimony of Calvin Lewis, an Abolition of Man-inspired novel and theatrical podcast.